Increasing Housing Targets and Design-led Densification – an Opportunity for Building Tall?
Increasing Housing Targets and Design-led Densification – an Opportunity for Building Tall?
The Draft London Plan was published for consultation in December 2017, setting out a new agenda for the delivery of much-needed housing across the Capital, including through ‘design-led densification’ and more pertinently, maximisation of brownfield land capacity
Name of Building: The Heron Tower
Year it was Built:2011
Height (m):242
Number of Storeys:46
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building: Millbank Tower
Year it was Built:1963
Height (m):118.87
Number of Storeys:33
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building: Trellick Tower
Year it was Built:1972
Height (m):98.1
Number of Storeys:32
Residential (y/n):yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Empress State Building
Year it was Built:2003
Height (m):117.3
Number of Storeys:31
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Battersea Power Station
Year it was Built:1933
Height (m):113
Number of Storeys: –
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:St George Wharf Tower
Year it was Built:2014
Height (m):180.6
Number of Storeys:49
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:The Shard
Year it was Built:2013
Height (m):306
Number of Storeys:73
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:One Canada square
Year it was Built:2012
Height (m):235.01
Number of Storeys:50
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Skyline
Year it was Built:2016
Height (m):101
Number of Storeys:31
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:The Lexicon
Year it was Built:2016
Height (m):120
Number of Storeys:36
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:BT Tower
Year it was Built:1964
Height (m):190.5
Number of Storeys:37
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Wembley Stadium
Year it was Built:2007
Height (m):133
Number of Storeys:6
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Structure
Name of Building:Apex Tower
Year it was Built:2015
Height (m):76
Number of Storeys:21
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:GWQ tower
Year it was Built:2015
Height (m):75
Number of Storeys:27
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:St Matthias’ Church
Year it was Built:1858
Height (m):61
Number of Storeys: –
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Tolworth Tower
Year it was Built:1964
Height (m):80.7
Number of Storeys: 22
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:The Tower
Year it was Built:1965
Height (m):54.26
Number of Storeys: 17
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Quadrant House
Year it was Built:1980
Height (m):76
Number of Storeys: 21
Residential (y/n):NO
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Croydon Transmitter
Year it was Built:1962
Height (m):153
Number of Storeys: –
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Structure
Name of Building:Crystal Palace Transmitter
Year it was Built:1950
Height (m):221.9
Number of Storeys: –
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Structure
Name of Building:SELCHP
Year it was Built:1994
Height (m):100
Number of Storeys: –
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Structure
Name of Building:The Waterman
Year it was Built:2017
Height (m):98.5
Number of Storeys: 33
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Marlowe House
Year it was Built:1966
Height (m):55.5
Number of Storeys:17
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Mercury House
Year it was Built:2013
Height (m):56.69
Number of Storeys:12
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:The Lemonade Building
Year it was Built:2009
Height (m):58
Number of Storeys:19
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Pioneer Point North
Year it was Built:2011
Height (m):119.4
Number of Storeys:31
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:150 High Street
Year it was Built:2013
Height (m):131.88
Number of Storeys:43
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Northwood Tower
Year it was Built:1992
Height (m):57.3
Number of Storeys:21
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Alexandra Palace Transmitter
Year it was Built:1936
Height (m):67
Number of Storeys: –
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Structure
Name of Building:Edmonton Refuse Incinerator
Year it was Built:1971
Height (m):100
Number of Storeys: –
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Structure
Name of Building:Hendon Waterside
Year it was Built:2016
Height (m):85.46
Number of Storeys: 27
Residential (y/n):Yes
Building or structure:Building
Name of Building:Kodak Chimney
Year it was Built: –
Height (m):57
Number of Storeys: –
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Structure
Name of Building:Heathrow Control Tower
Year it was Built: 2005
Height (m):86.87
Number of Storeys: 1
Residential (y/n):No
Building or structure:Builidng
Increasing Housing Targets and Design-led Densification – an Opportunity for Building Tall?
The Draft London Plan was published for consultation in December 2017, setting out a new agenda for the delivery of much-needed housing across the Capital, including through ‘design-led densification’ and more pertinently, maximisation of brownfield land capacity at key transport nodes and within identified Opportunity Areas. All part of the ‘Good Growth Agenda’. This is brought forward in tandem with even greater protection of Green Belt & Metropolitan Open Land and increased housing targets across all 33 of the London Boroughs.
One would assume that this ultimately paves the way for ‘taller development’ defined by the majority of London Planning Authorities as those buildings which are ‘substantially taller than their surroundings’ but only if it can be demonstrated that – the proposals will have no significant impact on the skyline, have no adverse impact on strategic or local views, positively relate to their surroundings, have negligible impact on neighbouring amenity, have no adverse impact on surrounding historic context, townscape, or other technical considerations (including daylight/sunlight, overshadowing or microclimate), are of high quality design, and will deliver other economic, social, and community benefits……….
Notwithstanding, the continued maximisation of brownfield land capacity for housing being at the forefront of the draft Plan represents a key opportunity, particularly at those sites which neighbour existing, or planned ‘taller’ and / or higher density development (which benefits from planning permission) thus providing a fundamental platform and justification for similar development, ‘complementing the skyline’ and the all-important ‘surrounding context’. However, greater scrutiny on design is an evident strand running through the draft Plan, with ‘high-quality principles’ required to be incorporated into all proposals (tall or not). Proactive and early engagement with both Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) and the Greater London Authority (GLA) will therefore be pivotal in helping to bring forward higher-density proposals at appropriate locations, coupled with demonstrable wider economic, environmental and social benefits.
The development of local level planning policies will need the input from those with an interest in delivering the number of homes and jobs the capital needs. There is a strong case to argue that ad hoc decisions on high density development, argued against broad policies, leads to a bottom up approach with an applicant having to fight their individual case with reluctant councils.
This will also be key from a political standpoint, given that taller development often receives a high-level of traction, and in many instances, resistance. Indeed, it is unlikely that ‘high-quality design’ and the presence of neighbouring, taller development will be enough in isolation, even in the midst of increased pressures to deliver must needed housing across the Capital…but it is a strong start.